Snohomish County Fire District 1 Chief Ed Widdis says the recent flap over the district’s retroactive billing for its union employees showcases the importance of creating some type of regionalized fire service.
“What I‘ve always said about these contracts is they were a Band-Aid,” Widdis said of the Fire District’s current agreements to provide fire service for Mountlake Terrace, Edmonds and Brier. “It shows why we need to move forward with a true fire department, if you want to call it that, regionalized.”
Mountlake Terrace, Edmonds and Brier, received bills in August for two years of retroactive pay — covering both 2013 and 2014 — after Fire District 1 completed labor negotiations with the union representing the district’s firefighters and paramedics.
All three cities indicated they were surprised by the amount of the increase.
When the fire district began cutting costs due to struggling economic conditions, the union agreed to defer nearly all of a planned cost-of-living increase beginning in 2012, taking only one month in January 2012 and delaying the rest. This also meant that the cities’ contract fee did not increase as it would have if the cost-of-living raise had not been deferred, Widdis said.
As a result, Widdis said he didn’t find the two years of pay increases agreed to during union negotiations surprising, “when you look that they haven’t really had an increase in five years.”
Widdis said he believes that when city officials and citizens said they were taken aback by the amount, it’s because “they are looking at it for a two-year jump,” rather than retroactive pay increases covering a longer time span.
“Yeah, maybe they (the cities) didn’t pay like they did in 2010-11 because everything was status quo,” he added. “We enjoyed that in the sense of not paying for it for four years but it (the increase) will get you sooner or later,” he said.
One idea that has been discussed among both city officials and the current five-member commission that governs the fire district: forming a Fire Advisory Board that includes a representative from each city.
The thought is that such a board would provide a voice for cities who currently don’t have a seat on the commission, since they are contracting with the Fire District and don’t have an elected official representing them at the table.
Meanwhile, Widdis said he is continuing to meet with finance directors from all three contracted cities to answer questions about the retroactive bills they received.
Among the questions raised were the amounts the district charged for administration, maintenance and operations, “so we are going back and showing them all the numbers and going through it,” he said.
“Really it’s due diligence,” Widdis said. “When you get a bill that like you shouldn’t be just sitting there, at any cost. We should go back and forth on it.
In addition, the commission has agreed to delay the due date of payments – which had been initially extended from Sept. 15 to Dec. 31, and will work with the cities to set up payment plans.
The Fire District is also doing all it can to ensure a relatively speedy resolution to the 2015 labor contract, which is now being negotiated, Widdis said. The hope is to have that settled by the end of the year.
The status of fire service regionalization
The bigger picture, Widdis said, is that it would be better for fire districts and cities to join forces and regionalize. That’s because fire service is expensive and regionalizing it allows staffing and other resources — such as fire trucks and related apparatus — to be spread more uniformly throughout the fire stations.
Under a regional approach, a crew from one station can be sent to staff another station when personnel are called away to an emergency. In addition, other decisions – from where to locate a new fire station to methods for improving response times – can be made based on what is best for the entire region, rather than for one city.
The idea picked up steam in early 2011, when a group of about 75 representatives of South Snohomish and North King County municipalities – including mayors, city councilmembers, city managers and fire chiefs – packed the third floor of Edmonds City Hall’s Brackett Room to learn more about what it takes to form a Regional Fire Protection Service Authority.
Nine jurisdictions had initially expressed interest in pursuing the RFA concept but after two years of meetings, the group had dwindled to just three members — Mountlake Terrace, Brier and Fire District 1, but Widdis said he’s hopeful that recent changes in state law, which make it easier to start with a smaller group of municipalities and add others over time, will renew enthusiasm for the idea.
Widdis said that Fire District 1 is still discussing the idea of regionalization with both the cities of Mukilteo and Lynnwood, which currently have their own fire departments. But he believes that regionalization should eventually cover from “Everett or Marysville to the county line.”
Whether regionalizing fire service would cost taxpayers more would really be up to the jurisdictions implementing the concept, Widdis said. All property owners (city and unincorporated) would pay a fire benefit charge linked to fire risk associated with their property. This would go directly to the regional fire authority. Since fire service would be provided and funded through the RFA, cities would no longer have to pay for it out of their coffers.
Each city would have to decide whether to reduce taxes (since cities no longer would be funding fire service) or to continue the same tax rate and apply the money saved on fire service to other municipal needs, Widdis explained. Such a fee is a variable rate based on the square footage and the amount of fire service provided to a home or business. (Businesses with a greater fire risk, such as manufacturing or companies handling hazardous materials, would pay more.)
The assumption is that cities involved in a regional fire district would continue the normal property tax, although some cities have reduced the amount collected for regular property taxes to offset the fire service charge.
I am one of many citizens of MLT who wished that the fire department’s logic applied to all of us. “Yeah, maybe they (the cities) didnâ€™t pay like they did in 2010-11 because everything was status quo,â€ he added. â€œWe enjoyed that in the sense of not paying for it for four years but it (the increase) will get you sooner or later,â€ he said.
The “status quo” of 2010 still applies to those of us without the capacity to bargain with cities, utilities, insurance companies and all the other institutions whose costs continue to escalate while the incomes we pay all of those with aren’t increasing at all. When does the “sooner or later” for “it (the increase)” begin for us?
Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.
By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.